REA MCP
☰
ZH-CN
● — 人在线 · 浏览 — 次
赞助提交案例
X 帖子 · 发布者 explos1ve

这绝对是我见过的最令人毛骨悚然的事情,有人打开了一个闭源

一篇帖子描述了将 REA 与 AI 模型结合使用,来解释用户拥有或获准检查的应用程序的功能是如何实现的,并引用了 REA 的展示案例:从编译后的二进制文件中恢复了一个游戏函数,并通过了 3,205 个测试。

e
explos1ve@explosss1ve

1/

THIS IS STRAIGHT UP THE CREEPIEST THING I'VE EVER SEEN someone opened a closed-source app and pointed Opus 5.5 at it with REA connected. it never asked for the source code. it didn't need it. it just started explaining how the app was built. feature by feature. from the button you click, down to the exact function that does the work. with evidence for every claim. in ONE afternoon. the thing companies spend years and entire legal teams protecting got read out loud by a chat window. and 99% of people have no idea this just happened. here's the whole thing. it fits in 4 lines: → open an app you own or are allowed to inspect → point Opus 5.5 at it with REA connected (it's literally called Reverse Engineer Anything) → ask how one feature actually works → read the answer that's it. Opus 5.5 does the rest. and it's not a party trick: in REA's own showcase, one function from an old game was recovered straight from the compiled binary. it passed 3,205 test cases and compiled back to the exact same bytes. now think about what this used to cost. in the 80s, Compaq did this to IBM. two teams. a room full of lawyers. months. back then, reverse engineering took entire teams and months of painstaking work. today, a single AI session can do in an afternoon what used to require an army of engineers. so how many $100M startups are protected by nothing except the fact that nobody has tried to reverse engineer them yet?

已翻译

关于这个案例

这绝对是我见过的最令人毛骨悚然的事情

有人打开了一个闭源应用,在连接了 REA 的情况下把 Opus 5.5 指向它。

它从未索要源代码。 它根本不需要。

它只是开始解释这个应用是如何构建的。一个功能接着一个功能。 从你点击的按钮,一直到完成工作的确切函数。 每个说法都有证据。

只用了一个下午。

公司花费数年时间和整个法律团队保护的东西 被一个聊天窗口大声读了出来。

而 99% 的人根本不知道这件事刚刚发生了。

这就是全部。四行就能说清:

→ 打开一个你拥有或获准检查的应用 → 在连接了 REA 的情况下把 Opus 5.5 指向它(它的名字就叫 Reverse Engineer Anything) → 询问某个功能实际是如何工作的 → 读取答案

就这样。剩下的由 Opus 5.5 完成。

而且这不是什么派对把戏:在 REA 自己的展示中,一个老游戏中的某个函数直接从编译后的二进制文件中被恢复出来。它通过了 3,205 个测试用例,并重新编译回完全相同的字节。

现在想想这过去要花多大代价。

在 80 年代,Compaq 对 IBM 就这么干过。 两个团队。一屋子律师。好几个月。

那时候,逆向工程需要整个团队和数月艰苦细致的工作。

今天,一次 AI 会话就能在一个下午完成过去需要一支工程师大军才能完成的事。

那么,有多少估值 1 亿美元的初创公司,除了还没人尝试逆向工程它们之外,其实什么保护都没有?

安装配置

安装方法请查看原始来源。

原文 / README

THIS IS STRAIGHT UP THE CREEPIEST THING I'VE EVER SEEN

someone opened a closed-source app and pointed Opus 5.5 at it with REA connected.

it never asked for the source code. it didn't need it.

it just started explaining how the app was built. feature by feature. from the button you click, down to the exact function that does the work. with evidence for every claim.

in ONE afternoon.

the thing companies spend years and entire legal teams protecting got read out loud by a chat window.

and 99% of people have no idea this just happened.

here's the whole thing. it fits in 4 lines:

→ open an app you own or are allowed to inspect → point Opus 5.5 at it with REA connected (it's literally called Reverse Engineer Anything) → ask how one feature actually works → read the answer

that's it. Opus 5.5 does the rest.

and it's not a party trick: in REA's own showcase, one function from an old game was recovered straight from the compiled binary. it passed 3,205 test cases and compiled back to the exact same bytes.

now think about what this used to cost.

in the 80s, Compaq did this to IBM. two teams. a room full of lawyers. months.

back then, reverse engineering took entire teams and months of painstaking work.

today, a single AI session can do in an afternoon what used to require an army of engineers.

so how many $100M startups are protected by nothing except the fact that nobody has tried to reverse engineer them yet?

更多类似作品